Monday, Aug. 15, 2011

"A Brief Lesson in Point of View"

Published in Echo Ink Review

By Ken Brosky
Google+ Pinterest Print

I wanted to share a link with you on narration because I know a lot of people who regularly check out this blog are writers themselves. It comes from the Echo Ink Review, which is doing a couple of really neat things right now, including a free writing workshop (which is literally worth its weight in gold).

Not only that, they're actually PAYING people who contribute. How crazy, I know! In addition, they sometimes "tip" writers whose work shows promise but was nonetheless rejected. Sure, it's only $3, but for a struggling fiction writer that feels like $1,000 or so.

Here's a little taste of the essay:

 

Viewing Beth, however, as a realistic character seems to create problems within the story. For instance, considering the two primary voices within the story, the narrator's and Beth's, is to recognize a division within the story, which raises questions: are both Beth and the narrator two separate characters making sense of mortality; are they both coming to terms with the ultimate truth? If so, why the distinction between voices? At best, two such individual voices suggest a convoluted and schizoid structure; at worst, they make absolutely no sense. Seemingly, Beth's conflict could have been more economically resolved through a restrictive third person or even a first person point of view.

 

Click here to read the whole thing.

It's worth pointing out that you can understand the essay even better if you can acquire a copy of "Thirst" by Nannette Rogers Kennedy. Even without it, though, you should feel your brain working a bit. If you like what you're reading, buy a copy of Echo Ink Review because literary journals like this keep writers sane.

Yours,

Ken Brosky

Log in to use your Facebook account with
Express Milwaukee

Login With Facebook Account



Recent Activity on Express Milwaukee