Issue of the Week: Bye-Bye BadgerCare
Plus Heroes of the Week
So it’s no surprise that Walker wants to avoid public criticism by burying his changes to Medicaid programs—which include BadgerCare, SeniorCare and Family Care—in his budget repair bill. Then, going further, he wants to ensure that his appointed head of the state Department of Health Services (DHS), Dennis Smith, could make sweeping changes to Medicaid programs without approval by the full Legislature. Only the Republican-dominated Joint Finance Committee would have to approve changes, and the committee isn’t required to hold a public hearing on requests, even when there’s an objection.
No debate. No constituent input. No vote taken by your democratically elected legislator.
The provision is so bad that, The Capital Times reported, the state attorney who drafted it isn’t sure if it’s even constitutional, since the Legislature would be ceding its power to create laws to the executive branch (that would be Walker and Smith). “Some of the language in the request [from the Walker administration] would allow the DHS to change any Medical Assistance law, for any reason, at any time, and potentially without notice or public hearing,” the attorney wrote in a memo to the Department of Administration.
So what’s on the table? While the federal health care reform law bars states from dropping Medicaid coverage, Walker and Smith—a known opponent of Medicaid—could try to exempt Wisconsin from the federal requirements and then start eliminating BadgerCare recipients. Barring that, Walker and Smith could make it more difficult to enroll in BadgerCare and end optional Medicaid services such as physical therapy, dental care and prescription drugs.
But who really knows what’s up their sleeve?
The bottom line is that Walker and Smith are poised to gut BadgerCare. They just don’t want you to know about it or be able to do anything to stop them.
Heroes of the Week
Milwaukee
Center for Independence
Since 1938, the Milwaukee Center for Independence
(MCFI) has been helping individuals and families with special needs to realize
their full potential for self-sufficiency by offering programs for children,
adults and seniors.
Southeastern Wisconsin has one of the highest
percentages of children with special-care health needs in the nation. MCFI
offers an array of services to help disabled children, including a “Birth to
Three” program to assist families with children diagnosed with developmental
delays, an accredited, Medicaid-certified Pediatric Special Care day nursing
center, and a School for Early Development & Achievement.
Crucial to the success of these vital services are
the efforts of hundreds of volunteers, who help out as tutors, mentors and
baby-rockers, as well as by doing clerical work or assisting with special
events.
Readers who wish to help are encouraged to call MCFI
at 414-937-2188 or fill out a volunteer application at www.mcfi.net.



I tried to get BadgerCare and they discriminated against me because of income limitations. Yet they will give it to someone who opts to take a lower income. BadgerCare also encourages people to work less hours so they can't qualify for their employers more expensive health plan. Wonderful, reward people for choosing to make less money. I'm for BadgerCare but make it available to everyone, not just low income people.
But one problem is a lot of doctors are dropping Medicaid patients because they can't make a profit on them. So maybe its a blessing I don't have it.
Gosh, David... sounds like another supporter of the "public option" that Obama and so many liberal Democrats wanted. Too bad your favored Republicans and conservatives stripped it out of the federal plan.
But, untouchable insurance wouldn't have it! Competition (aka consumer's choice) that forces them to keep prices and profits at a free market level? No legally sanctioned monopolies? No agreements to simply pass high healthcare costs on to employed premium & deductible payers middle-man markup?
Maybe if people could work for less hours and still get a benefit somewhere, maybe employers could employ more people, people who are more rested and up to the task of high quality work!
Of course, you could have the employers fire the married women and hire their husbands with enough pay to support her staying at home. That would drastically reduce the amount of job seekers to a level below the number of jobs, maybe the jobs would pay more to get decent workers to leave company A for company B. Turn it back to a (labor-)seller's market, oh so "50's" again.
We wouldn't even need Medicaid or BadgerCare if we did this right and installed a Medicare-for-all system. Which, incidentally, would the best thing that could happen for our businesses and jobs. BUT the insurance industry, which helps fund political campaigns, last year to the tune of $125 million, doesn't like that idea a bit.
Jack Lohman
http://MoneyedPoliticians.net
The problem with medicare for all is that a lot of doctors are dropping Medicare patients. My doctor told me she would let me remain a patient as a courtesy but she was not taking on any new Medicare or Medicaid patients. She doesn't want a waiting room full of poor people that she can't make a profit on. So its not much good if the good doctors won't accept it.
djlresearch, I've been on Medicare for 7 years, and my doctor keeps reminding me to come in for my yearly exam. Which he wouldn't do if he was losing money. See pnhp.org. Medicare is not AS profitable as private insurance, but it is still profitable even after paying their salaries. And if we had such a system the doctors other choices would be consierge or plumbing. Even still, 59% of doctors prefer Medicare-for-all.
Hmmm really. Wonder why my doctor is turning away new Medicare and Medicaid patients? Maybe your doctors is just grandfathering you in like my doctor did.
Because doctors eventually grow out of needing Medicare volume, when the privates usually pay double. Why take the lower reimbursement when you don't have to? But even if they took 100% Medicare they'd still make money. Just not as much.
There are way too many WI Residents on Badger Care. This program needs massive reform to dramatically increase shared costs by those that are on it.
That's sort of not possible. These people don't have money to put food on the table.