You
might think the notion of a bunch of septuagenarians and octogenarians belting
out cover versions of rock ’n’ roll tunes sounds hopelessly schmaltzy. You
wouldn’t be alone.
Stephen
Walker, the director of Young@Heart,
says he chuckled at the irony of his initial reaction. When his wife approached
him with the idea of hearing a concert by the group,Walker recoiled at the prospect and told her,
“That sounds awful.”
“I had little interest in the concert,” Walker says. “I didn’t
know what to expect. I thought it was a gimmick or it might be karaoke.” However,
Walker’s wife persisted and he begrudgingly
attended a sold-out show in London.
The
experience won him over. “It was a packed house
at the Lyric Theatre, which seats about a thousand people,” he says. “All ages
were there, from kids to 80-year-olds to baby boomers.”
During the concert, Walker
says he experienced an epiphany: “I was looking at music I knew in a whole
different way. I came
out of the show revved up.”
The
46-year-old Walker
decided that the Northampton, Mass.-based group would constitute ideal subject
matter for a documentary. “I thought that it offered a look at old age through
the prism of rock music,” he notes.
First,
he had to obtain the approval of the group’s choral director, Bob Cilman. “Actually, nine other companies had approached him
about filming the group,” Walker
says. “There had already been some projects featuring Young@Heart, including a
segment on “20/20”
and a short Belgian film that really didn’t focus on the music.”
Cilman was reluctant at the beginning, but he eventually
relented. Walker, who received funding from Britain’s Channel 4, ended up
shooting 140 hours of footage over the course of seven weeks. The Young@Heart
group consists of two-dozen members, but Walker
decided to narrow the scope of the documentary.
“It was important to focus on four or five members, but not
lose focus of the entire group,” he says.
Walker had simple
criteria for selecting which members would merit special attention. “They had
to be wildly distinctive,” he says. “They were so strong. It became clear when
we met them.”
In addition to the group members, Choral Director Cilman
emerges as an interesting character in his own right.
“He’s tough, but he’s a great guy,” Walker notes. “He knows they have to make
great music. He’s got to be tough because he’s an artist, not a social worker.”
The film effectively marries levity with an examination of
some sobering topics. In the course of making the documentary, several chorus
members died, which made for a daunting challenge while editing the film.
“I always feel that pathos is pathetic in a film if there is
no humor in it and I feel humor is not funny if there is no pathos,” Walker says. “If we
evaded the big issues, it would have been tedious and patronizing. When we
edited the film, it was like walking a tightrope between humor and poignancy.
It’s an incredibly dangerous tightrope to walk, because you can so easily fall
off it. Then, it’s a sick joke and doesn’t work at all.”
Walker was convinced that
Young@Heart had the
potential to reach a wider audience than it would receive on British
television, so he decided to enter the film into the 2006 Los Angeles Film
Festival. Walker’s
hunch proved wise when the film garnered the Audience Award for Best
International Feature. The enthusiastic response prompted Fox Searchlight to
acquire Young@Heart for theatrical distribution.
“I never set out to make a message film,” Walker says. “People take away an
inspirational message, though, that getting old is not hopeless and these
people can offer so much to society. Their energy level is extraordinary and
they’re always in search of new challenges.
“I had no idea that people of this age could live like
this,” he adds.
Comments