The Ryan Effect
The Wisconsin media's continued insistence that the Janesville congressman is still some kind of shining star in Republican national politics is a wonder to behold.
Incredibly, the Ryan swoon persists even as Democrats across the nation rejoice about their election prospects in 2012 as a result of the widespread public rejection of Ryan's mean-spirited budget proposal to destroy Medicare.
The most recent hard evidence came when Democrat Kathy Hochul won the rock-solid Republican congressional district in the New York suburbs of Buffalo and Rochester, which had been held for four decades by conservative Republicans.
The election was openly fought over Ryan's proposal to replace the popular Medicare program with a voucher system that would ultimately force the elderly to pay two-thirds of the cost of their own health care.
In the same edition in which it was reporting the devastating defeat for Ryan and the Republicans in New York, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel ran a gushing article by right-wing columnist Jonah Goldberg headlined: “Run, Ryan, Run.” It urged Ryan to seek the presidency and was accompanied by a full-color Tiger Beat pinup, the better to look into Ryan's baby-blue eyes.
The reason why Ryan will not run for president is the same reason he quickly announced he would not run for the job he had previously geared his every political move toward seeking, the Senate seat being vacated by Democrat Herb Kohl.
Ryan on a national or statewide ticket in 2012 would be toxic for Republicans.
Paul Ryan Exposed
Ryan is over, having been exposed as the nasty, right-wing extremist he is. When he became House budget chairman, Ryan's radical ideas were no longer simply his own dark vision for America. They were instantly transformed into an ugly, new Republican agenda.
Media pundits were taken in by Ryan far longer than they should have been. Some still haven't caught on.
You can still read national columnists—and not just right-wing propagandists such as Goldberg—who write about Ryan's “courage” and “bold ideas” for trying to reform social entitlement programs such as Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security.
There is nothing bold or courageous about Republicans trying to destroy Social Security and Medicare. It is simply their nature. Republicans have steadfastly opposed those programs ever since they were created.
Republicans simply don't believe in government programs to assure guaranteed income and health care for every American in their old age. Those luxuries are for the wealthy to enjoy. And the wealthy don't appreciate their taxes going to provide it for everyone else.
Why were so many in the media hoodwinked by Ryan? Don't underestimate the media's susceptibility to superficiality. Ryan seems like such a nice, young man.
First, you have to consider that most Republican leaders are extremely sour toads. Standing next to the Senate minority leader, Mitch McConnell, and House Speaker John Boehner, Ryan looks like Prince Charming.
But Ryan is that too-good-to-be-true first date. The problem is the closer you examine Ryan's proposals, the uglier he looks. All of that boyish, biting-lip sincerity falls away to reveal an unattractive streak of open contempt for anyone but the very wealthy who expects anything from their government.
Any notion Ryan might be a nice guy is dispelled completely when the Prince of Darkness himself, former Vice President Dick Cheney, says: “I worship the ground that Paul Ryan walks on.”
Ryan's not an honest man, either. Ryan justifies devastating cuts to health care for seniors, the poor and the disabled as absolutely necessary to reduce an unsustainable federal deficit.
Yet, Ryan's cuts don't do anything to reduce the federal deficit. In fact, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office says Ryan's radical budget plan actually will increase the federal deficit by more than $8 trillion over 10 years.
That's because Ryan redirects the trillions cut from Medicare and other programs people need into even more enormous tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires, the only Americans Ryan really cares about.
In elections all across the country next year, just as in New York, Republicans will have to try to explain away their continued support for Ryan's proposal to destroy Medicare.
So why not in Wisconsin? Two first-term Republican congressmen, Sean Duffy and Reid Ribble, voted in lockstep for Ryan's destruction of Medicare. Voters should demand they answer for it.
And Ryan himself has a serious challenger, Kenosha County Supervisor Rob Zerban, who is launching his campaign with a petition to preserve Medicare at the pointed website handsoffmygrandma.com.
Ryan has become an important national figure, all right. He's the best campaign ad Democrats have for regaining control of the House of Representatives.



There goes Mr. McNegative. All obsessed with the Republicans, Millionaires, and Billionaires. Well Joel get out your ID and vote next time. It appears not enough of your lazy friends got out of the hammocks long enough to vote. Guess they were too either too drunk, too high, or too busy scratching lotto tickets. Maybe they too fat to vote after eating all their free Food Stamp pop and chips.
Negative! What's negative? The prospect of Rep. Ryan, who "represents" me, going away is very positive. Joel...It's great when you bring out this kind of ire.
Is verbal diarrhea your mode of operation? Seems like this entire publication oozes of naive, uninformed, and uneducated writers.
thats why they work for the flunky free paper.
Yet you trolls are here multiple times per week (day?), earning revenue for the website you hate so much.
Woo..Hoo Vent boys vent. I love it! Good thing that you DO read the Shepherd so you know what's going on.
Great article as usual Joel. If we are fortunate, Ryan and his kind will be gone in 2012. I wish I could be that optimistic. I'm sure we'll see millions of dollars worth of pro-Ryan adds by Americans for Prosperity and other right-wing extremist groups and corporations. The question is, will people buy it when they lose their benefits or jobs? Will they still think that some corporation will hire them? Sounds like the failed trickle-down economics from the Bush I era that still does not work for families with homes and children.
Are you also upset about the millions of dollars that Soros and his various groups use to influence elections? Please, tell us exactly which "evil rich people" are allowed to shovel money into elections. With you left-wingers and your malleable ethical standards, I'm never sure who to be upset with...
I would agree that Soros and other weathy persons and corporations should not have the ability to buy elections as they now do. What we need are "clean money elections" where people can run for office without being indebted to the wealthy or corporations for future favors. Politicians spend about 1/3 of their time just raising money, so we are in constant campaign mode. Check out Jack Lohman's blog below...a Republican by the way...who posts a number of excellent articles on campaign reform and healthcare reform.http://www.ThrowTheRascalsOut.org/eNewsletter147.htm