The Trouble With Trump
His past doesn't match the hype
Anticipating such scrutiny, Trump should use more caution when mouthing off about "welfare," for instance. His family wealth and his own business have both depended heavily on the corporate welfare that supports the real estate industry, starting with the Federal Housing Administration support that undergirded his father Fred's residential empire more than half a century ago.
The sudden refurbishing of Trump as a rugged individualist is as ridiculous as those tea party zealots who hate all government programs, except their Medicare. In Trump: The Deals and The Downfall, the classic biography by investigative journalist Wayne Barrett, the mythology of the self-made success is pulled aside to show a scion of family privilege, abused power and political sleaze.
Young Donald learned early on about the rental supplements, tax abatements, government loans and other state capitalist tools available in his native New York—especially to a budding developer whose daddy greased the necessary connections to the Democratic political machine.
When Trump was getting started, Mario Cuomo was governor—and Donald hired the governor's son, Andrew, who has since ascended to that high office. Meanwhile, he lavished money on Democratic pols high and low, and they repaid him with favors that made his projects financially viable.
Donations to Democrats, Support for Bailouts
In short, Trump is hardly what he claims to be—and voters will soon realize that very few of the man's boastful statements about himself and his record can stand up to the slightest scrutiny. "I was a great student, I went to the best schools," he told a tea party rally in Florida recently.
Actually, he couldn't cut it at the small New York City private school attended by his siblings, and he was removed to a military academy upstate that specialized in discipline for troubled and failing boys, where he barely earned a B average. From there, he went on to Fordham University and then the Wharton Business School at the University of Pennsylvania. While both are very fine institutions, Trump coasted academically, although he later bragged that he had earned "the highest grades possible."
It is Trump's bizarre remarks about President Obama, including his birthplace, his schooling and his literary career, that invite the examination of his own past. But perhaps it is pointless to criticize the bluster and hype that are, after all, the most important element in Trump's success. Particularly for the Republicans whose party he may attempt to lead, the more pertinent questions concern his politics, policies and ideology. The answers can be summed up in a single word: opportunist.
Over the years, Trump has mostly donated money to Democrats, including Sens. Chuck Schumer, Dick Durbin, Harry Reid (that scourge of the tea party) and Rep. Anthony Weiner, the Brooklyn firebrand who often represents liberals on cable television. He gives to Republicans, too, but not nearly as much or as often. During the last cycle, he gave $30,400 to the National Republican Senatorial Committee—but overall he has given more ($116,000) to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. In 2004, he gave to George W. Bush and to John Kerry.
He vocally supported the bank and auto bailouts; he praised Barack Obama before turning around to vilify him; he has endorsed higher taxes on the wealthy and sworn that he would never raise taxes, period. The single reliably Republican aspect of Trump's life is his enduring connection with Roger Stone, a Nixon-vintage dirty trickster.
Watching him run will be fun—unless you're a Republican who hopes to win back the White House.
© 2011 Creators.com



Once again, Conason misses the point. Trump is an arrogant ass. His greatest talent is self-promotion, and he is seemingly bulletproof in that respect. Slings and arrows will not hurt this man- and the mainstream media will be hard-pressed to beat him up the way they do other Republican candidates. He may have more sway over NBC than even Barry Obama himself, and he is as comfortable in front of a camera as anyone who has ever run for President.
The true Trouble with Trump is that this man could actually win the White House, and we'd all be the worse off for it- Republicans and Democrats alike.
I agree, Trump is an arrogant self promoter and is not my choice for a presidential candidate. He was for Obama Care and now he is against it. He has used the US bankruptcy law 4 times now to further his financial position and screw others including investors and banks (US tax payers) our of their hard earned money. Anyone that votes for this guy hasn't been paying attention or just recently escaped from living under a rock ! He really doesent have a chance at being elected and is doing nothing more than using the publicity to further his TV ratings and make more $$. P.S I wouldn't vote for a Democrat ......
I just disagree with the assertion that Trump can't get elected. People watch "Pawn Stars", "The Real Housewives", and "Teen Mom". I wouldn't put anything past the American public right now.
Don't forget about his attempted land takeovers with the eminent domain laws. Remember all the press he stirred up when he tried to through a old lady off her land that he wanted so badly?
I think Conason misses the point too. Trump is a character on Tv and a lot of what he says is for ratings. I think the last think I would list about a succesful man like Trump is his failures. I doubt Donald Trump gives a big sheeet about what some jealous free paper writer thinks. I gladly want to vote for billionaires and millionaires. Really, if you are 40 years old and not a millionaire, then it shows personal weakness in not being ambitious and a good manager of money. We want to elect millionaires and billionaires. Goverment is all out money and taxes and people who don't have money really are not qualified to be making trillion dollar decisions.