Issue of the Week: Repealing Health Care Reform Is the Wrong Move
Plus Hero and Jerk of the Week
Wisconsin’s Republican members in the House of Representatives got their wish, too, by voting for the “Repealing the Job-Killing Health Care Law Act” last week.
Fortunately both efforts are public relations stunts, because a repeal of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) would have some real consequences.
Repealing the law would prevent Wisconsin from saving $365 million in the Medicaid and BadgerCare programs over the next five years, according to an analysis by the nonpartisan state Legislative Fiscal Bureau. So if Republicans are serious about crafting a fiscally prudent state budget, repealing health care reform isn’t going to help them.
Other reforms that have already kicked in would be killed. For example, almost 15,000 young adults in Wisconsin are now eligible to stay on their parents’ insurance plan until they turn 26. That benefit would be gone. Almost 18,000 seniors received a $250 check last summer to help fill the Medicare Part D donut hole. Will seniors have to pay that back to the government? The PPACA also banned insurance companies from dropping policyholders once they get sick and from imposing a lifetime limit on care, changes that greatly improve consumer protections for more than 3.5 million Wisconsinites. Do these 3.5 million Wisconsinites really want to purchase insurance that’s worthless once they get sick? Doubt it. And then there are the 89,000 small businesses in the state that are eligible for a tax credit on their 2010 taxes. Repealing PPACA would kill that tax cut immediately.
Republicans have to face facts: The federal health care reform law was passed legally after a year of debate and scrutiny. It will survive legal challenges. It is the law of the land.
However, when a bill of this magnitude is passed, there always are some glitches or unintended consequences that need to be corrected. If Republicans or Democrats can come up with alternatives that actually save the government, the health care industry, patients or policyholders more money than the current law—while protecting consumers and improving outcomes—it would be a real service to their constituents. Taking symbolic votes and joining politically motivated lawsuits won’t improve our health care or our finances.
Heroes of the Week
City Year Youth Volunteers
While
politicians and talking heads point fingers over the low percentage of
Milwaukee students who graduate from high school, one group has taken direct
action to provide positive change.
City Year,
a national organization whose efforts in Milwaukee are supported by local
businesses and charitable foundations, offers young people 17-24 years old the
chance to be tutors, mentors and role models in high-risk neighborhoods for a
full year of service. As part of City Year’s school-based mission, youth
volunteers provide academic support and after-school assistance and organize
activities that improve the learning environment for everyone.
The group
also works to physically transform communities by planting urban gardens,
building play spaces and refurbishing community centers. Young, civic-minded
people willing to make a vital difference in the long-term health of the
community are encouraged to apply by visiting the group’s local website at
www.cityyear.org/milwaukee.aspx or calling their offices at 414-223-0150.
Jerk of the Week
Former State Sen. Jeff Plale
He’s back!
(And still causing trouble.) After voters ousted him in last fall’s Democratic
primary, former state Sen. Jeff Plale has landed a cushy job working for
Republican Gov. Scott Walker. This shouldn’t come as a surprise, since Plale
has always worked in the interest of Republicans, even when he was a Democratic
legislator. (Remember Plale’s last-minute deathblow to the Clean Energy Jobs
Act last spring? The special-interest lobbyists sure do.)
Now that
Plale is out of his job as a state senator, Gov. Walker has given him a
$90,000-a-year job as an administrator in the Division of State Facilities. One
of his first tasks as Walker’s appointee was to kill the proposed biomass plant
at UW-Madison, a major innovative green energy project. One of Plale’s last
acts as a state lawmaker, during the lame duck session, was to vote with the
Republicans to kill the pending labor contracts, at the same time he was
angling to be hired by Walker.



Healthcare... it's easy to get lost in the numbers, numbers are a good way to shut people up. But, what raises most people's anger is non-mathematical principle. Taxpayers do not want to pay for anything received by a non-taxpayer.
Other countries... with socialized healthcare. Let's call it socialized because that gets to the fighting words for us capitalist 1040 filers. With socialized healthcare, it means everyone gets care, whether they work or not. Yet, even in these countries, the money has to come from those with money, not from those who have no money... which gets back to taxation... is it tax the working poor, the middle-class, or the wealthy, how is that broken down?
In our country, it's still the same. The Healthcare costs are paid by those with money, aka jobs. It just goes through private insurance companies (who pay bonuses to their CEOs), instead of through taxes (civil servants do not get any bonuses). Only the better jobs have insurance, and we all know that the ER's are serving the have-nots by charging higher prices on those with insurance... Which still gets back to where those with jobs are paying the healthcare of the have-nots anyway.
Small business, big business. American business has already shed themselves the responsibility of having to follow through with a pension after the worker has stopped working for them (It's called 401k). Wouldn't they LOVE to also shed themselves of having to pay health insurance premiums or pay the "self-insured" healthcare bills of it's workers? Would not this make it so that it wouldn't matter if the job was casual workers or full-time workers?
If all healthcare costs were taken from taxes, then a person could work 2 half-time jobs or one full-time job, and if the pay adds up the same, then the healthcare taxes would be the same, too. You would now have the part-time workers holding up their part of healthcare via taxes. Look - FICA and Medicare are taxes out of even a part-time worker's paycheck, a tax that cannot be filed for 1040 refund or EIC.
You all complain about "Job-killing" healthcare reform, it's not "Job-killing" when even healthy people are forced to pay for health insurance, spreading the sick people's costs over more premium payers. It's not "Job-killing" if you truly did create a public option. Insurance companies are the only jobs killed, but other companies would benefit from being relieved of the burden of providing health insurance.