Archdiocese of Milwaukee Files for Bankruptcy
How will it affect sex abuse victims, parishioners and the church itself?
But Archbishop Jerome Listecki’s official announcement was a bit of a shock.
Despite the wealth of the archdiocese—it has recently raised $95 million for its Faith In Our Future trust fund—Listecki announced that the church simply cannot cover its operating costs in addition to potentially paying out millions of dollars to clergy sex abuse victims who are suing the archdiocese for fraud, since an appellate court ruled late last year that the archdiocese’s insurance wouldn’t have to cover its fraud cases.
That leaves the archdiocese itself responsible for its potential claims.
Settlement
Talks Scuttled
The timing
of the archdiocese’s Chapter 11 filing comes at a critical time for the
survivors of clergy sexual abuse in Milwaukee. After years of rejection in
court and inaction by the state Legislature, 23 victims of clergy sexual abuse
were finally going to have their day in court in 14 fraud cases.
These cases
weren’t merely about the sexual abuse of children. While the archdiocese has
settled almost 200 claims of clergy sex abuse (and paid out more than $29
million over the years), these cases allege that church officials committed
fraud because they knew about predator priests and concealed that information,
putting other children at risk of abuse.
These
victims and church representatives met twice in mediation to try to find an
out-of-court resolution.
However, the
victims wanted to discuss 13 non-economic issues before a financial settlement
could even be broached. For example, they wanted the church to release the full
list of names of all known clergy predators and their files and also to require
all priests within the diocese, including the archbishop, to sign a statement
under oath that they have never sexually abused a child and do not know of any
other clergy members who have done so.
Talks fell
apart after two meetings and communication outside of the sessions.
Julie Wolf,
a spokeswoman for the archdiocese, said the church has been as transparent as
it can be and has made some records public and released files to former
Milwaukee County District Attorney Michael McCann and retired Judge Leander
Foley for review. Some of the victims’ requests, Wolf said, would violate
church law and practice, such as forcing the release of files belonging to
priests in the religious orders, since, technically, the archbishop does not
supervise these priests.
“Substantially,
we have met those requests,” Wolf said.
But Jeff
Anderson, attorney for the victims, said that the Milwaukee archdiocese isn’t
as transparent as it claims to be.
“They have a
long-standing pattern of deceit,” Anderson said.
The two
sides also differ on the financial offer made by the church to the victims.
Archbishop Listecki claimed that the victims had rejected a $4.6 million offer
to settle the claims. But Anderson said that the money had not been requested
and would not be discussed until the non-economic and child protection matters
had been settled.
“We are
united in this priority,” Anderson said.
Bishop
Sklba’s Deposition Delayed
At the same
time the mediation talks were under way, the 14 fraud cases were moving ahead
in Milwaukee County Circuit Court.
In fact,
Anderson said, Bishop Richard Sklba was to be deposed in January.
According to
Anderson, Sklba has unique knowledge of the church’s handling of sex abuse
claims, and plaintiffs saw his testimony as crucial to their cases.
But Sklba’s
attorney had petitioned to have Sklba’s deposition blocked or sealed. Anderson
said he objected to that. Sklba’s deposition was then scheduled for February,
Anderson said.
The
bankruptcy proceedings, however, have temporarily halted the fraud
cases—including Sklba’s deposition.
“It is my
belief that their bankruptcy filing is designed in part to prevent this
information from coming out,” Anderson said.
A
Silver Lining for Victims Shut Out of the Legal Process
While the
fraud cases are in limbo right now, it’s almost certain that they will move
forward eventually.
Milwaukee
bankruptcy attorney Will Green said that the bankruptcy judge, Susan V. Kelley,
will have to make a ruling on the fraud cases at some point. Kelley can find
that the victims are entitled to a jury trial and allow them to continue their
cases in state court. Or, Green said, Kelley can try to resolve them in
bankruptcy court or move all of the proceedings to federal court.
“One way or
another, somewhere down the line, the claimants are going to be allowed their
discovery,” Green said. “They are going to have their day in court from the
standpoint of fact-finding no matter what.”
Although the
victims’ cases have been temporarily halted by the bankruptcy proceedings,
their attorney Anderson said there’s a bright side for all victims of clergy
sex abuse in the Milwaukee archdiocese, including those who have been denied
their day in court because either the statute of limitations has run out or
they couldn’t make a case for fraud.
Anderson
said that all of these victims can be incorporated into the committee of
creditors and become part of the bankruptcy settlement. Even Archbishop
Listecki said that the Chapter 11 filing was a “last call” for victims to come
forward.
“Bankruptcy
opens the door in a new way,” Anderson said. “Survivors going back decades in
silence can find resolution.”
Victims will
also likely have a say in the archdiocese’s reorganization plan, since a
majority of the archdiocese’s creditors in its bankruptcy proceedings—a large
number of whom are the abuse victims—will have to sign off on it.
In some
bankruptcy proceedings involving a Catholic diocese, the reorganization plan
includes non-monetary issues such as the release of files. For example, the
diocese in Portland, Ore., emerged from bankruptcy in 2007 when it came to a
$75 million settlement agreement with sex abuse victims and opened relevant
clergy files. Some victims also received letters of apology from the
archdiocese and meetings with the archbishop.
“We are
pursuing complete disclosure,” Anderson said.
University
of Wisconsin Law School professor Jonathan Lipson said opening up the Milwaukee
archdiocese’s records could be part of a settlement here. But it’s not certain
that a bankruptcy judge could force a religious entity such as the Milwaukee
archdiocese to do so.
“These
[clergy sex abuse-related] cases push the bankruptcy system to its
institutional limit,” Lipson said. “At some level these cases are not
exclusively about money. Money is obviously important, but in many cases the
plaintiffs want something more than money. They want the names. They want an
apology. They want a commitment about future conduct. If the debtor agrees to
it, that’s great. But I don’t think a bankruptcy court has the power to order
the church to do any of those things.”
In addition, Lipson said that the bankruptcy
judge would likely not be able to go to the limit and liquidate the
archdiocese, since that would interfere with parishioners’ right to practice
their religion.
What’s
Next for Parishioners and the Church
Archbishop
Listecki has stated that the Chapter 11 proceedings wouldn’t affect individual
parishes and schools, since they are separately incorporated and are legally
independent of the archdiocese. Listecki has also said that he hoped that the
bankruptcy judge would recognize that the archdiocese’s recent fund-raising
entity, the $95 million Faith in Our Future Fund, is independent as well. The
fund is a separate 501(c)(3) charitable trust established in 2007 by
then-Archbishop Dolan to support Catholic education and faith.
“The trust
is a separate legal entity and is not part of the Archdiocese of Milwaukee,” a
statement from its trustees reads. Two of its trustees, incidentally, are
Listecki and Sklba.
Archdiocese
spokeswoman Wolf said the archdiocese has not set up a trust fund for
contributions to compensate victims of clergy sex abuse.
While the
church is arguing that its parishes and the trust fund are separate and
off-limits to the sex abuse victims and other creditors, UW law professor
Lipson said that the bankruptcy judge may not agree.
“There are a
variety of bankruptcy-specific mechanisms that can be used to, in essence,
force those assets into the estate and therefore become available to
creditors,” Lipson said.



“These [clergy sex abuse-related] cases push the bankruptcy system to its institutional limit,” Lipson said. “At some level these cases are not exclusively about money. Money is obviously important, but in many cases the plaintiffs want something more than money. They want the names. They want an apology. They want a commitment about future conduct. If the debtor agrees to it, that’s great. But I don’t think a bankruptcy court has the power to order the church to do any of those things.”
That's pretty much true.