Tuesday, Jan. 11, 2011
The GOP Is Holding the Economy Hostage; It's Time to Call Its Bluff
Cutting domestic spending would stymie growth
In their ideological zeal, the new Republicans on Capitol Hill
seem eager to gamble everything—the financial reputation of the United States,
the international status of the dollar, even the chance of a worldwide
depression—on a showdown over the national debt ceiling. What has been mostly a
routine if unpleasant debate in years past, with each party blaming the other
for the nation's rising indebtedness, is rapidly becoming a mortal threat to
economic recovery.
The congressional Republican leaders, like their counterparts on the Democratic side and in the White House, all understand that the debt limit must be increased—just as they understood the imperative of the bank bailouts two years ago. But that won't stop them from indulging in reckless rhetoric—or from seeking to take advantage of the situation in ways that could result in dangerous consequences, as they vow to hold the debt ceiling hostage to enormous budget cuts.
These veteran leaders appear to have learned nothing since the debacle of 1995, when then-Speaker Newt Gingrich told the bond industry that he would allow the country to default on its debt unless President Clinton agreed to his plans to slash Medicare and other federal programs. "I don't care what the price is," he declared.
That was a very different time—and the price of default would be far higher today, in a world where nations and states on the verge of insolvency continuously threaten to scuttle global recovery. Back in the ’90s, the Clinton administration was able to outwit Gingrich both politically and fiscally, using tactics that preserved the full faith and credit of the Treasury without capitulating to Republican demands.
Clinton forced the Republicans to fulfill their bluff. Now the numbers are bigger, the space to maneuver is smaller, the potential downside is incalculable—and the nihilistic ignorance of the tea party faction is the dominant attitude within the GOP.
Even the merest prospect of default would be gravely damaging to American prestige and prosperity, continuing the apparent Republican project of hastening our national decline that began with the invasion of Iraq under false pretenses (and the refusal to pay for that multitrillion-dollar disaster). So it is understandable that the Obama administration would want to find some way to lure the Republicans and their fanatical minions away from the edge of the cliff (and stop them from taking us all with them).
What the Republicans have hinted they must have in order to release the debt hostage is a package of budget cuts amounting to at least $100 billion this year—or a rollback of spending on discretionary programs (excepting veterans, defense and homeland security) to 2008 levels—and perhaps a deal to destroy Social Security and Medicare, as well. They have carefully refused to offer specific cuts that might anger their own constituencies.
No doubt the Obama White House, which too often prefers "bipartisanship" to principled confrontation, will be tempted to make such a deal. The problem is that cutting the budget so drastically will undo the stimulative effects of the December tax-and-spending agreement—and plunge the economy back into recession. The president loses either way.
Perhaps the time has come for the Democrats to adopt a different strategy. Let the Republicans govern, or misgovern. Don't rescue them from their own recklessness. Don't vote to raise the debt ceiling unless and until the Republican leadership supports the bill—and if they refuse, let them take the responsibility for the consequences. Let's see how long they can listen to the screaming of their major contributors on Wall Street as the world economy shudders. Make the hostage-takers surrender this time.
© 2011 Creators.com
The congressional Republican leaders, like their counterparts on the Democratic side and in the White House, all understand that the debt limit must be increased—just as they understood the imperative of the bank bailouts two years ago. But that won't stop them from indulging in reckless rhetoric—or from seeking to take advantage of the situation in ways that could result in dangerous consequences, as they vow to hold the debt ceiling hostage to enormous budget cuts.
These veteran leaders appear to have learned nothing since the debacle of 1995, when then-Speaker Newt Gingrich told the bond industry that he would allow the country to default on its debt unless President Clinton agreed to his plans to slash Medicare and other federal programs. "I don't care what the price is," he declared.
That was a very different time—and the price of default would be far higher today, in a world where nations and states on the verge of insolvency continuously threaten to scuttle global recovery. Back in the ’90s, the Clinton administration was able to outwit Gingrich both politically and fiscally, using tactics that preserved the full faith and credit of the Treasury without capitulating to Republican demands.
Clinton forced the Republicans to fulfill their bluff. Now the numbers are bigger, the space to maneuver is smaller, the potential downside is incalculable—and the nihilistic ignorance of the tea party faction is the dominant attitude within the GOP.
Cuts Increase Risk of Another Recession
Even the merest prospect of default would be gravely damaging to American prestige and prosperity, continuing the apparent Republican project of hastening our national decline that began with the invasion of Iraq under false pretenses (and the refusal to pay for that multitrillion-dollar disaster). So it is understandable that the Obama administration would want to find some way to lure the Republicans and their fanatical minions away from the edge of the cliff (and stop them from taking us all with them).
What the Republicans have hinted they must have in order to release the debt hostage is a package of budget cuts amounting to at least $100 billion this year—or a rollback of spending on discretionary programs (excepting veterans, defense and homeland security) to 2008 levels—and perhaps a deal to destroy Social Security and Medicare, as well. They have carefully refused to offer specific cuts that might anger their own constituencies.
No doubt the Obama White House, which too often prefers "bipartisanship" to principled confrontation, will be tempted to make such a deal. The problem is that cutting the budget so drastically will undo the stimulative effects of the December tax-and-spending agreement—and plunge the economy back into recession. The president loses either way.
Perhaps the time has come for the Democrats to adopt a different strategy. Let the Republicans govern, or misgovern. Don't rescue them from their own recklessness. Don't vote to raise the debt ceiling unless and until the Republican leadership supports the bill—and if they refuse, let them take the responsibility for the consequences. Let's see how long they can listen to the screaming of their major contributors on Wall Street as the world economy shudders. Make the hostage-takers surrender this time.
© 2011 Creators.com



Whats the big deal about cutting wasteful spending? The economy has recovered. Stock market is up, plenty of jobs, interest rates are low, housing prices are cheap. Now our tax on dividends and capital gains is staying low. We don't need no stinking stimulous.
Â
Â
Republicans will introduce a business friendly climate in this state and after 2012, nationally.
O ne B ig A wful M istake A merica.
Â
Why do we not hear more about raising energy costs as we did in 2008? Seems to me that maybe the anti-Bush press was wrong in 2008? Or maybe the pro-Obama press is hiding this? one or the other, we should not be happy with this.
Just had a memo at work, they dropped the Social Security deduction on our paychecks to 4.2%, instead of the usual 6.2%. The employers match will continue to be 6.2%. The 1.45% medicare tax ( employer match) remains as is.
WOW that's a 2% raise in my takehome, so my boss can short me by 2% when raises are handed out! Meanwhile, less money going into Social Security, making it less solvent for when I retire 10-15 years from now.
But, get this! Your part-time "casual" workers, the ones who get ALL their withheld income taxes back when they file their 1040EZ and Form 1-EZ... there is still money going into gov't coffers at 7.65% from them, non-refundable, plus an equal match from their boss! Note that's like a 15.3% tax (14.2% of what the boss had to take out of the till for that worker), that you cannot file to get back, EIC or otherwise. Who is the damn fool who thinks the working poor do not pay taxes?
Any of us who makes $106,000 or less is paying that 15% non-refundable "wage" tax. The ones making money on dividends and interest do not pay anything to FICA. The ones who make anything over that $106,000 are only paying the medicare portion on the amount above that mark. Means the man making $1 million is only paying 4% over-all, and the $10 million CEO is effectively paying only 3%.
And you say the rich cannot afford to pay anymore taxes? Regressive FICA makes them able to pay!
Get back to the root cause... we as a society had been living off of credit... specifically the 30 year mortgage that had paid for housing starts! And we kept it going with re-financing and pushing the end back out to 30 years again. Money that the movers and shakers were collecting this year, and we retail consumers and working class homeowners AND RENTERS (rent pays the landlord's mortgage), are left with up to 30 years to cover what the builder took in 3-6 months, plus interest (Yaaayy Banks!)
There is no way out that doesn't cause MAJOR loss to somebody. The battle is merely over who those losers will be. If I were the rich who got the big tax cut, I guarantee you that I will make sure my money is not in this country when it does collapse... leaving all those invested in america to be the loser! I would even be like Enron, advise everybody to buy my stock, while I sell mine off so I can buy where the grass is greener.
That said, how can my white ass stick it to the darkies (written on this MLK Jr day), or how can my Republican ass stick it to all you Democrats! Oh.. I don't have any foreign investments, so I must be either dark or democrat! Maybe we should save the trash talk for the Packers-Bears game this Sunday.
Yeesh! We were NEVER sustainable ever since we left the gold standard, but that's the price of fast growth (for a conniving few).
Small-business job creation nothing. Who is going to be the overseas sucker to spot us the credit again, while we live high on the hog? Who will buy our Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac "bonds". And we don't intend to ever pay it back!
Or maybe we should be like colonial times England... just conquer someone and take what they got! It might be easier.