Republican Hypocrisy on Health Care
GOP candidates bash health care reform on the stump but take advantage of it in private
Yet these same Republican candidates—Ron Johnson, for U.S. Senate; Scott Walker, for governor; and Rebecca Kleefisch, for lieutenant governor—have used state-sponsored health care when it works to their advantage.
They just don’t want you to know about it.
Johnson’s
PACUR Employees on BadgerCare
Senate
candidate Ron Johnson has claimed that he decided to run for office to repeal
the recently passed health care reform bill, which he calls “the greatest
assault on our freedom in my lifetime.”
Johnson
wants to replace it with a free-market approach, but he offers few specifics
about what that would entail. In addition, Johnson often claims that he’s never
gotten government assistance for his plastics manufacturing business, PACUR.
Yet the
state Department of Health Services confirmed that as of Sept. 30, five PACUR
employees, with 10 children, were on the state’s BadgerCare program for low-income
workers. BadgerCare currently serves almost 800,000 Wisconsinites. The
BadgerCare Core Plus program, for single childless adults, is so in-demand that
it has a waiting list of 75,000 state residents.
To be
eligible for BadgerCare, a family of four must have less than $44,100 annual
income; a single person is eligible if he or she earns less than $21,660 per
year.
A PACUR
human resources employee wouldn’t comment on the company’s health insurance
policy, and the Johnson campaign wouldn’t respond to the Shepherd’s multiple requests for comment.
Not much is
known about the privately owned PACUR, which was started by Johnson’s
father-in-law, Howard Curler, then the CEO of Bemis Co. Estimates of the
numbers of its employees have ranged from a low of 72 to a high of 120.
But what is
public knowledge is that PACUR has gotten government assistance through the
years. It has participated in a work-release program with the state Department
of Corrections since 1998. Health care for those employees is paid by the
state. PACUR has also benefited from low-interest government-backed loans and a
state-subsidized rail spur that leads to PACUR’s door.
Yet Johnson
refuses to acknowledge that the government has aided his company in any way.
Walker: Repeal the Health Care Bill That’s Helping Milwaukee County
(And Local Corporations)
Like
Johnson, gubernatorial candidate Scott Walker has vowed to repeal the federal
health care reform bill, calling it a “job killer.”
Yet
according to Steve Kreklow, the county’s fiscal and budget administrator, Walker’s administration
has applied for a little-known provision in the bill, the Early Retiree
Reinsurance Program. The program, which began in June, allows businesses,
unions and units of government to be reimbursed for medical claims for early
retirees and their spouses, ages 55 to 64. These retirees—who aren’t yet
eligible for Medicare—are among the most expensive to insure.
However, the
anticipated revenue for Milwaukee County coming from the recently passed federal health
care reform legislation doesn’t even show up in Walker’s proposed 2011 budget. Nor has Walker mentioned the
federal funds on the campaign trail.
Milwaukee
County is among 90 entities in Wisconsin that have applied for this benefit, a
list that includes Journal Communications, Johnson Controls, Harley-Davidson,
Manpower, Kimberly Clark, Marshall & Ilsley, Rockwell Automation,
Northwestern Mutual Life and We Energies.
At least
seven corporations that have applied for the benefit are represented on the
board of Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce (WMC), which strongly opposed the
federal health care overhaul.
Walker’s campaign did not respond to the Shepherd’s request for comment on the
health care funds.
But Walker did respond to the
Metropolitan Milwaukee Association of Commerce’s candidate questionnaire, where
he stated once again that he’d allow the state attorney general to opt out of
the federal reforms.
He neglected to mention that the early retiree
provisions in the bill will help Milwaukee
County and private
corporations hold down their health care costs.
Walker also failed to note that if the state does opt out of the federal
reform, Milwaukee
County—and companies like
Journal Communications and We Energies—would likely have to refund any money it
receives back to the federal government.
Rich
Abelson, head of AFSCME District Council 48, which is involved in a stalemate
with the Walker administration over what Abelson
calls Walker’s illegal 2010 budget and worker
concessions, also criticized Walker’s
under-the-radar use of federal health care reform funds. While the anticipated
funds could plug the hole in Walker’s budget, Walker is using the
county’s ongoing fiscal crisis to unilaterally enact $24.5 million in employee
and retiree wage and benefits concessions in 2011 alone.
“It affects
negotiations, it affects the county budget,” Abelson said of the federal funds.
Kleefisch:
Health Care for Me, But Not for You
Walker appears in a new TV ad with his running
mate, Rebecca Kleefisch, warning about the dangers of a “government takeover of
health care.”
Yet
Kleefisch and Walker don’t mention that they both benefit from state-subsidized
private insurance for public employees. Kleefisch’s husband is a state
representative who can choose from a number of private insurance plans that are
regulated and subsidized by the state.
The
Kleefisch family pays $85 a month for its coverage, while taxpayers subsidize
$1,722 per month for that care. The candidate was recently successfully treated
for a tumor on that plan.
Kleefisch,
who is self-employed, apparently prefers the government-sponsored health care
options to the ones that her small business could find on the free market.
The state
employee plan, with its mix of private insurance plans, will likely be a model
for the insurance exchanges that will be set up under the federal health care
bill. This is not a “government takeover” of health care.
Robert
Kraig, executive director of Citizen Action of Wisconsin, called on Walker and
Kleefisch to give up their publicly funded health care.
“It is both
inconsistent and unethical for Walker and Kleefisch to exempt themselves from
their own policy positions on health care,” Kraig said in a statement.
Kleefisch
and Walker also fail to mention that they plan to cut BadgerCare to balance the
state’s budget, even though companies like Ron Johnson’s PACUR are benefiting
from the program.
Phil Walzak,
spokesman for Tom Barrett’s campaign, blasted Walker’s health care agenda.
“Whether
it’s making up lies about Tom Barrett’s health care record or trashing the
health care bill but applying for money from it or attacking health care reform
even though both Walker and his running mate get government-provided,
taxpayer-subsidized health care, the list of hypocrisies and contradictions
goes on and on,” Walzak said. “At the end of the day it just proves that Scott
Walker will do or try anything to get elected.”



Again I have to thank you liberal clowns for shoving the health care bill, that no one wants or supports, down our throats. It essentially has lead to your own demise. I can not wait to hear the bitching after you get your asses kicked on Novermber 2nd. I absolutely love it! Thanks again intellectually dishonest and lazy liberals!
The misfired attempt at healthcare reform may be unpopular, but I wouldn't recommend that anybody vote for Republicans thinking they'll entirely repeal the healthcare reform bill:
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-health-politics-money-20101005,0,4869233.story
The corrupt and dysfunctional health insurance industry wants the mandate that people buy insurance to stay in place but of course wants anything in the legislation that doesn't benefit their profitability to go. I can easily imagine a Republican Congress acting accordingly, because when have the Republicans ever *not* done the bidding of their friends in big business?
@BabyLove- Simple question- if you want an entitlement society, who will pay the bills? Income taxes are paid by corporations and individuals who are paid by corporations. Property taxes are paid by corporations and individuals who are paid by corporations. Sales taxes are paid by people who are paid by corporations and purchase the goods and services that those corporations produce. If you have a pension or investments, you are the owner of corporations. If you work for a corporation or purchase the goods and services that are produced by corporations, you have a stake in the continued success of those corporations. When you kick business in the groin, you kick yourself in the groin. Government creates nothing- in fact, when the government prints money, the value of that money decreases! When you demonize the insurance and healthcare industries, think about how many people those industries employ. This is simple common sense- without strong businesses and producers, there is no entitlement society. Making business the bad guy is a simple, but effective tactic used by the left to attract the votes of the takers. Unfortunately, this tactic is like cutting off your nose to spite your face- but even less logical.
corrina, you really need to come up with a new catch phrase. "Liberal Clowns" is extremely tiresome.
Corrina, nobody wants you to post here and yet you do; hence even if "nobody" wanted healthcare reform, which clearly people do, you would be indirectly supporting someone who champions healthcare reform in spite of no support. You're stupid, Corrina. Just plain stupid. There's no two ways about it. You're a moron.
Corrina, I have to thank you for your moronic, childish posts. You continue to perpetuate the perception of Conservatives as naive, foolish, intellectually inferior sheep. Keep up the good work, chum.
@PP: Way to sidestep the issue. The fact remains that if you vote for Republicans hoping they will repeal Obamacare, there's good reason to think that simply won't happen. As they say on Reddit.com, "RTFA!" (Read The Freaking Article.) And knee-jerk demonization of government and its programs is just as myopic as knee-jerk demonization of business interests. However, there are occasions when criticizing specific moves and policies of either or both are completely appropriate.
@meepos: I really think its best to ignore Corrina and her gloating partisan Manichaeism that adds nothing to the discussion of the issues at hand. Her obsession with SE liberal commentary is little more than a function of an ignorant true-believer mindset.
Very true, Baby Love. It's just too darn fun f-in' with her.
"It's just too darn fun f-in' with her."
Which is all you ever do on here. If Corinna adds nothing to the discussion of the issues at hand, your equally juvenille responses to her comments mean that you consistently add less than nothing.
*you're, not "your equally," Bob. regardless of the content of my posts, which don't always trend towards playing Corrina's lil game, at least I have a firm grasp on grammar.
How do you "own all of" us? I doubt you even own a pair of socks. The wildest predictions don't even put the Republicans in control of the Senate after the election. Republicans will take the House, but Democrats will still have the Senate and White House. I'm going to enjoy watching Tea Partiers and Republicans tear each other to shreds. It'll be like watching a Jerry Springer show.
@meep: The best the Repubs will be able to do in the Senate is get a 50-50 tie, in which case VP Biden would be the "tie-breaking" vote. We can thank Christine O'Donnell for that, because if the Tea Partiers had managed to nominate better than such an utter dribble-glass of a candidate, maybe the Republicans could have snagged that one seat in the Senate that would have given them control of that house of Congress.
@BabyLove- Did I knee-jerk demonize government and it's programs? Not at all. I merely pointed out that a thriving private sector is the only way to pay for those programs (and for Russ Feingold's housing stipend, transportation and alimony- because he's not a millionaire and is very proud to not have a pot to piss in...) So, you sidestepped the issue. I have never said that Obamacare should be repealed. In fact, I have never even called it by that dumbed-down name. There are parts that make sense and parts that don't. AND, it's not possible to repeal it until 2013, regardless. The important point to make is that the left is constantly demonizing businesses of all sizes and accounting classifications- apparently ignoring (or ignorant of) the fact that business pays for everything that the government does. Every dime the government wastes (not that every dime is wasted) comes from the private sector. Again, to call for entitlements and demonize business in the same campaign platform is the height of illogical thinking.
"*you're, not "your equally,"
No it isn't. Read the sentence again Balki.
"at least I have a firm grasp on grammar."
No you don't.
You also don't have a firm grip on the fact that you're the one being f'd with. You're not doing the f'ng. Have you ever noticed that he/she never responds to you? You're feeding the troll.
You ineffectual liberals are just too damn easy! I own all of you. Just wait until the conservative tsumani on Nov. 2nd. My posts will just get better and better.
I'm pretty sure I know what your freaking problem is, aside from rampant True Believerism. You have what is known as Histrionic Personality Disorder, namely a compulsive social need for entirely undeserved attention. Of course, I tend to think that's true of a great many Internet trolls who spend their time generating so much flatulent sound and fury but little in the way of substantive discussion. Such a shame that I have to feed your attention-whoring compulsion in order to point this out. :-(
"You have what is known as Histrionic Personality Disorder, namely a compulsive social need for entirely undeserved attention. Of course, I tend to think that's true of a great many Internet trolls"
As if corrina did not know that he/she is a textbook troll and that the repetitive inflammatory rhetoric was all just some big coincidence. Or is your post directed at meepos and you were just trying to be polite and tactful?
I agree with Chris Hedges's perspective on the Tea Party and how it is basically a reaction to the moral and practical failure of establishment-liberalism (which Hedges refers to as "the Liberal Class").
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/10/25-7
Good priorities and writing.
Thanks for your work Lisa.