Myths and Facts About the July Flood
And what you can do to prevent more overflows
Since the
storm, many myths have circulated about what happened, what should have
happened to prevent basement backups and sewage overflow into local waterways,
and what can be done in the future to prevent flooding and water damage.
Here are
some of the most prominent myths—and facts—about the flood, the role of the
Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District (MMSD) and how local governments,
businesses and individuals can improve the area’s water management.
Myth: The basement backups and sewage overflows are all MMSD’s fault.
Fact: MMSD is only one part of a carefully integrated system of public and
private infrastructure. While MMSD owns 300 miles of pipes and the Deep Tunnel,
the 28 municipalities in MMSD’s region own 3,000 miles of pipes, and individual
property owners also own another 3,000 miles leading from their properties to
the local sewer line.
Before
figuring out what happened during the July storm, it’s best to look at how the
system works during a regular rainfall. During an average rainstorm, water goes
into a catch basin or storm drain and then flows into the municipally owned
sewer system (either a storm sewer or a combined sewer containing both storm
water and sanitary sewer water). If it’s in a separated sewer area, the
untreated storm water goes directly into a local waterway. If it’s in a
combined sewer area, it goes to the metropolitan interceptor sewer, owned by
MMSD, which leads to the Jones Island or South
Shore water treatment
facilities, where both the storm water and sanitary sewer water are treated
before being discharged. During heavier rainstorms, that water goes to the Deep
Tunnel, where it’s held until it can be treated.
On the night
of the big July storm, a lot of that rainwater didn’t even make it to the MMSD
pipelines.
Here’s what
happened during that storm: A lot of water was trying to enter the local sewer
system during a short period of time—for example, through the grates in the
street. But the rainfall was so intense it couldn’t filter into the sewer
grates fast enough, so it seeped into people’s homes—though the window wells or
through leaky or cracked walls and floors. This water then drained through the
basement floor drain. When it did, it flowed to the sanitary sewer system, as
if it was sewage. That storm water overloaded the sanitary sewer pipes that are
owned by the individual and the local municipalities, and then backed up into
basements.
“There were
probably a lot of instances in the last storm where there was so much flow so fast
on the local system that it never had a chance to get to our pipes because the
local system couldn’t keep up and it backed up into people’s homes,” said Bill
Graffin, MMSD’s public information manager.
Not only
that, but an overloaded pipe in one home can start a chain reaction and flood
other homes on the block.
That’s why
many municipalities need to address the size and condition of their storm
sewers to ensure that they can handle an intense storm. Because if heavy
rainfall can get into the system in a decent amount of time, the water won’t
back up into basements.
Myth: The Deep Tunnel failed on the storm of July 22-23.
Fact: The Deep Tunnel did not prevent an overflow during this very heavy
rainfall, but the Deep Tunnel prevented a bad situation from becoming much
worse. During the big storm, which was so exceptional that it made national and
international news, an estimated 30 billion to 80 billion gallons fell on the
region. MMSD can treat and store 1.1 billion gallons per day, which is more than
adequate for an average heavy rainstorm.
The Deep
Tunnel holds 521 million gallons of water in reserve, until it can be treated.
In doing the math, the Deep Tunnel could never have held the amount of water
that fell on the region in just a few hours.
So why do we
need the tunnel? Because without it, that half a billion gallons of untreated
water would have flowed directly into Lake Michigan or flooded basements and
streets—and we would have between 50 and 60 overflows per year, as we had
before the Deep Tunnel was built.
“If the Deep
Tunnel had not been built, you would have had a massive overflow and the same
number of—if not more—basement backups,” said MMSD Executive Director Kevin
Shafer.
Myth: We could eliminate overflows if we separated the combined sewers that
exist in parts of Milwaukee
and Shorewood.
Fact: Unfortunately, even sewer separation would not have prevented
overflows from the July storm. The mechanics of separation is complex and
cannot be done on 11% of the combined sewers because they are located in
Downtown Milwaukee and cannot be disturbed due to that location. Second, it
would cost an exorbitant amount—about $4.5 billion to $5.8 billion—to separate
the sewers and upgrade other features in the system, according to MMSD’s
calculations. That estimate includes the cost to add 230 million gallons of
capacity to the Deep Tunnel, add 300 million more gallons to the treatment
facilities, add another 100 million gallons to tunnel pumping to relieve the
tunnel, and then spend at the very least $2.7 billion to separate the sewers.
That is a very conservative estimate, and even those additions may not prevent
overflows and backups during intense storms. Finally, where sewers are
separated, all of the storm water that contains the oil, rubber from tires and
animal waste drains untreated into the waterways.
So the combination of combined sewers and the Deep Tunnel
reduces pollution.
“The pollution would have been worse getting to the rivers than
what we had, because we were able to capture it [in the Deep Tunnel] and treat
part of that flow,” MMSD’s Shafer said.
Myth: MMSD pumped untreated sewage into Lake Michigan.
Fact: MMSD has 150 points where untreated overflows are released. Only two
of those 150 points go directly into the lake. The rest of them flow into the
region’s three rivers—the Milwaukee, Menomonee
and Kinnickinnic rivers—which then flow into Lake Michigan.
By the time it gets into the lake it’s sort of milky white, MMSD’s Graffin
said, not some sort of a brown plume that looks like untreated, raw sewage.
According to the state Department of Natural Resources (DNR), MMSD reported
releasing 171 million gallons of untreated water from the sanitary sewer system
into local waterways and 1.9 billion gallons of combined sewer overflows (a mix
of storm water and sanitary sewer water, which is about 90% storm water and 10%
sanitary sewer water). MMSD is allowed to have six combined sewer overflows per
year and averages about 2.6 overflows annually.
But MMSD
wasn’t the only entity to have overflows. According to the DNR, 12 local
municipalities in MMSD’s region reported sanitary sewer overflows as a result
of the July storm. Those municipalities are Milwaukee,
Mequon, Brookfield,
Cudahy, Wauwautosa, Muskego,
Fox Point, Menomonee Falls, Shorewood, Brown Deer, Elm Grove and Whitefish Bay. South Milwaukee, which has its own treatment
facility, also reported a sanitary sewer overflow.
Although the
state does not allow any of these municipalities to release sanitary sewer
overflows into local waterways, Jim Fratrick, a watershed specialist at the
DNR, said that none of these municipalities would be punished because all are
in compliance with a 2005 order to upgrade their systems. None of their actions
was negligent, Fratrick said, which would be a reason for some sort of punitive
DNR action.
Myth: That bad smell along the lakeshore is sewage that was released
directly into the waterways.
Fact: That bad smell doesn’t seem to have anything to do with the overflows.
Actually, it’s a problem with algae called cladophora,
said Fratrick of the DNR, a recurring problem along the lakeshore.
Myth: Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett promised that he’d shake up MMSD so that
there would be no overflows and he hasn’t done anything.
Fact: Barrett commissioned an independent audit, which found that MMSD’s
management of the system could not be faulted for overflows that resulted from
a 19-day window of heavy rain in 2004. However, that audit did turn up problems
with infiltration and inflow in all of the communities in MMSD. Infiltration
and inflow problems include leaky pipes, downspouts that are connected to the
sewer system, foundation drains in homes, and illegally hooked-up sump pumps.
MMSD has
identified weak spots in the region and has allocated $1 million to the
municipalities so they can begin to repair those problems, and it is aiming to
allocate $30 million over the next five years for further work.
Myth: There’s nothing I can do as a concerned citizen about protecting the
region from flooding and overflows.
Fact: While these intense storms have been rare in the past, they’re going
to be regular occurrences in the future, experts say, the result of climate
change. These are going to be especially difficult to deal with in a highly
developed urban area like Milwaukee,
since pavement, large-scale development and aging infrastructure make high
volumes of water difficult to absorb.
Fortunately,
there are many strategies that individuals, businesses and local governments
can implement to improve the region’s water management. But there’s an added
benefit, too: These solutions consume far less energy than traditional sewage
systems use to pump and treat wastewater and storm water.
- Homeowners can
disconnect their downspouts from the sewer lines and run them away from their homes
and into their gardens or lawns. They can add rain barrels, which hold up to 55
gallons of water that can be used for gardens and lawns when it isn’t raining.
They can plant rain gardens or native plants, which improve water absorption.
Owners of older homes with foundation drains can add a sump pump, which would
remove water from their home.
- Businesses and some
homeowners can add green roofs, which reduce storm-water runoff, decrease a
building’s energy consumption and improve air quality.
- Governments or
large property owners can add more greenspace to their developments in the form
of greenways, wetlands or bioswales. Porous pavement would allow water to drain
into the ground below the pavement, instead of running into the sewer system.
And more trees and plants located along roadways will enhance absorption of
storm water.



Actually some very good ideas presented. Not sure of Milwaukee and Milwwaukee County can afford it. Raise taxes and get-r-done.
It would fix some of the cumbling tunnels all over Milwaukee and the County itself. Some of the more viable immediate solutions like using rain barrels and more absorbant plants in yards would help even more.
I agree it will be expensive. And, maybe there will need to be a temproary tax increase (althought they are never temporary...just check the sales taxes).
However, it does bother me that the Governor is trying to spend $300 million of the $800 million at such a recklace pace on a train most in WI don't want when we so desparately need it for other things (and I know it was given for a special purpose).
If we would have seperated the 2 systems instead of digging the deep tunnel, the pipes would not have been carring the rainwater and no sewage would have been in the homes.
ShepEx is starting to sound a bit like MMSD, in that some of the most important issues about our recent flood are being smeared over. One is the problem of combined sewers and the overflows into people's basements.
1. If, as stated, 89% of the sewers still combined could be separated, would that eliminate sewer backups for those folks? Well, would it? If so, why aren't we doing it, regardless of the cost? 2. Why didn't we do it many years ago, when it probably would have caused fewer street problems and cost less? 3. Who is responsible for diverting the issue to tunnels? Who did the bad math regarding the amount of water that MMSD would have to deal with? 4. Are there not other ways that people can prevent sewer water from coming into their basements? Why aren't these being put into place by MMSD? 5. Why aren't the tunnels used exclusively to store the worst water, that from the combined sewers, instead of street water? Would that prevent basement backups?
Also, none of the solutions offered at the end of the article would likely prevent sewer backups as long as the sewers aren't separated. They might take a small load off the combined system, but if in a huge downpour of the sort we had ALL the water is diverted to the tunnels, nothing would be accomplished by anyone diverting the water to the street.
Also, why aren't animal wastes brought up more? Doesn't anyone want to talk about the fact that doggiedoo residue is a known source of cryptosporidium, the stuff that made a lot of people sick about 20 years ago? In almost every rainfall, all this goes into the lake.
Also, why aren't there some solutions being offered for homes and businesses that tend to flood because of their location? Should sewers in those locations be larger? Should streets be realigned to provide better runoff? Do we need some arroyos? Where are all the ideas needed to help these people? Should some or all of the structures in these areas be bought out and removed and these areas be made into parks? Is all the talk about 100 year floods a bunch of baloney?
These and many more questions still need to be discussed? When will you begin?
akra
Communities like Fox Point recognized after the 97 flooding that retention ponds provided a safety valve for large volumes of water. Why not look at that concept? Also, how can we hover over a 300 foot bluff along Lake Michigan and get so much surface water trapped in the wrong places? It seems that if we could divert some to the lake, it's better to have street pollutants than sanitary pollutants.
Maybe it's time not just for rain barrels but old fashioned cisterns. If water is going to be the precious commodity of the next century, why not start now in trying to conserve large amounts from our rainfall
The hypocrisy of you lazy liberals is comical. If a private business or corporation were to dump one turd in the lake you bozos would be picketing in front of their place of business.