The Deception of Real-World Inception
Many old sci-fi stories, like politics and
advertising of the past, subscribed to the "Clockwork Orange" theory
that says blatantly propagandistic repetition is the best way to pound concepts
into the human brain. But as "Inception's" main character, Cobb,
posits, the "most resilient parasite" of all is an idea that
individuals are subtly led to think they discovered on their own.
This argument's real-world application was
previously outlined by Cal State Fullerton's Nancy Snow, who wrote in 2004 that
today's most pervasive and effective propaganda is the kind that is "least
noticeable" and consequently "convinces people they are not being
manipulated." The flip side is also true: When an idea is obviously
propaganda, it loses credibility. Indeed, in the same way the subconscious of
"Inception's" characters eviscerate known invaders, we are
reflexively hostile to ideas when we know they come from agenda-wielding
intruders.
These laws of cognition, of course, are brilliantly
exploited by a 24-7 information culture that has succeeded in making "your
mind the scene of the crime," as "Inception's" trailer warns.
Because we are now so completely immersed in various multimedia dreamscapes,
many of the prefabricated—and often inaccurate—ideas in those phantasmagorias
can seem wholly self-realized and, hence, totally logical.
The conservative media dreamland, for instance,
ensconces its audience in an impregnable bubble—you eat breakfast with the Wall Street Journal's editorial page,
you drive to the office with right-wing radio, you flit between Breitbart and
Drudge at work, you come home to Fox News. The ideas bouncing around in this
world—say, ideas about the Obama administration allegedly favoring blacks—don't
seem like propaganda to those inside the bubble. With heavily edited videos of
screaming pastors and prejudice-sounding USDA officials, these ideas are
cloaked in the veneer of unchallenged fact, leaving the audience to assume its
bigoted conclusions are completely self-directed and incontrovertible.
Same thing for those living in the closed-loop of
the "traditional" media. Replace conservative news outlets with The New York Times, NPR,
Washingtonpost.com and network newscasts, and it's just another dreamscape
promulgating certain synthetic ideas (for instance, militarism and market
fundamentalism), excluding other ideas (say, antiwar opinions and critiques of
the free market) and bringing audiences to seemingly self-conceived and
rational judgments—judgments that are tragically misguided.
Taken together, our society has achieved the goal of
"Inception's" idea-implanting protagonists—only without all the
technological subterfuge. And just like they arose with Cobb's wife, problems
are emerging in our democracy as the dreams sow demonstrable fallacies.
As writer Joe Keohane noted in a recent Boston Globe report about new scientific
findings, contravening facts no longer "have the power to change our
minds" when we are wrong.
"When misinformed people, particularly
political partisans, were exposed to corrected facts in news stories, they
rarely changed their minds," he wrote. "In fact, they often became
even more strongly set in their beliefs."
What is the circuit breaker in this delusive cycle?
It's hard to know if one exists, just as it is difficult to know whether Cobb's
totem ever stops spinning. For so many, meticulously constructed fantasies seem
like indisputable reality. And because those fantasies' artificial inception is
now so deftly obscured, we can no longer wake up, even if facts tell us we're
in a dream—and even when the dream becomes a nightmare.
David Sirota
is the author of the best-selling books "Hostile Takeover" and
"The Uprising." He hosts the morning show on AM760 in Colorado and blogs at
OpenLeft.com. E-mail him at ds@davidsirota.com
or follow him on Twitter @davidsirota.
© 2010 CREATORS.COM



Comments