Our Secret Leviathan
Billions spent on an uncontrollable national security state
Considering
what had been done in the name of the United States, from Mafia assassination
plots against foreign leaders to murder, corruption and coups d’état, that
concern was quite sensible. And there was hell to pay when the hidden history
began to emerge.
During the
nine years since Sept. 11, the national security state has doubled or tripled
in size, with huge annexes in the private sector—and the culture of secrecy has
metastasized simultaneously. As The
Washington Post reports in a landmark series titled "Top Secret
America," by Dana Priest and William Arkin, the dimensions of the security
colossus are stunning. It is nothing less than a fourth branch of government,
so large, so powerful and so wealthy that no other branch can even grasp it,
let alone control it.
How big?
Nobody knows exactly, not even the Post
investigative team that spent two years researching and gathering many
thousands of public records—including government contracts, intelligence
reports and corporate documents—and conducting interviews with exceptionally
knowledgeable sources.
But Priest
and Arkin, whose work ought to be read by everyone, say that there are as many
as 1,271 government entities and 1,931 private companies "working on
programs related to counterterrorism, homeland security and intelligence in
about 10,000 locations across the United States," with an estimated
854,000 people—far more than live in the city of Washington, D.C.—holding
top-secret security clearances."
More than 30 building complexes for top-secret intelligence outfits are either under construction now or have been built since September 2001; altogether, these buildings occupy 17 million square feet of space.
Are
We Any Safer?
Nobody in
the White House, Congress or any of the intelligence agencies, including the
new Office of the Director of National Intelligence, seems to have the capacity
to manage the complex tangle of agencies, companies and off-the-books entities
that are supposed to protect us from violent extremism.
After
reviewing the way that the Defense Department oversees its most sensitive
intelligence and operational programs last year, retired Army Lt. Gen. John R.
Vines told the Post reporters that he
found the morass almost incomprehensible: "I'm not aware of any agency
with the authority, responsibility or a process in place to coordinate all
these interagency and commercial activities. The complexity of this system
defies description."
Calling this
thing a "system" is a bit misleading. But does the leviathan
offspring of government and corporation make us safer? That, too, is difficult
to determine—in fact, it is impossible to determine, as the writers explain,
because with "so many more employees, units and organizations, the lines
of responsibility began to blur."
We have no
way of knowing precisely what the national security complex does with the
hundreds of billions of dollars in its shrouded budgets. What we do know is
that billions of dollars are wasted through redundancy, corruption and sheer
overgrowth. Too many agencies are performing the same tasks, such as shutting
down terrorist money transfers and generating too many reports for anyone to
read.
Most
disturbing is that so many critical functions are outsourced to private
corporations, primarily loyal to shareholders and management. The role of these
corporations and their lobbyists, who controlled the creation of the Department
of Homeland Security during the George W. Bush administration, is a challenge
to democracy of unprecedented proportions.
Despite
presidential promises of transparency, the Barack Obama administration is
fostering more secrecy, not less—which is exactly the wrong way to cope with
this problem. Our democracy and our security both depend on bringing this
monstrous bureaucracy to heel—and that can only be done in the sunlight.
© 2010 Creators.com



Comments