Boot Camp Blues
The only thing more satisfying to some people than
sanctimoniously sermonizing about miscreants who haven’t led proper lives is
screaming it right in their faces, calling them maggots and vermin.
We’ve seen the model in films like Stanley Kubrick’s
Full Metal Jacket where boot camp
instructors put military recruits through dehumanizing and degrading drills to prepare
them for rewarding jobs as cannon fodder.
These questionable methods of training and
discipline don’t transfer well to civilian life because the people who get
coerced into such programs are usually those who already have had far more
brutality in their lives than anyone needs.
The last thing we should want is to dehumanize them
further.
Unfortunately, some incarceration facilities are not
controlled by corrections professionals, but by posturing, tough-guy
politicians such as Maricopa County,
Ariz., Sheriff Joe Arpaio and
Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke.
Milwaukee County Executive Scott Walker, attempting
to avoid any county responsibilities that could interfere with his race for
governor, recently transferred administration of the county’s House of
Correction to Clarke, who is elected separately.
Attacking Successful Programs
Clarke, a former police officer with no background
in corrections, immediately demonstrated his lack of knowledge by attacking
education, drug and alcohol treatment and job training programs under his
jurisdiction.
Because his own department’s statistics showed
offenders who went through such programs had lower rates of recidivism than
those who did not, Clarke could only try to discredit those programs by
counting arrests for minor offenses that never went to trial or resulted in
acquittal.
District Attorney John Chisholm and Chief Judge
Jeffrey Kremers, county law enforcement professionals who care about reducing
crime, diverted money from their own budgets to continue successful education
and treatment programs.
If Clarke cared about community safety, he would
celebrate and expand such programs instead of trying to discredit them.
Studies show 60% or more of offenders released back
into the community without such programs commit new crimes while the recidivism
rate for offenders who receive drug treatment or job training can be less than
a third of that.
Having failed to shut down programming that reduces
crime, Clarke is trying a different tactic. Counting on his right-wing
talk-radio friends to support treating people at the bottom like dirt, Clarke
is beginning a brand-new boot camp program he hopes to expand to replace other
programs.
Clarke calls it DOTS for Discipline, Order, Training
and Structure. Like Arizona Sheriff Arpaio, Clarke likes to experiment with
different humiliating patterns of jumpsuits for inmates. An appropriate new
uniform for this one might be clown suits with polka dots.
Instead of staffing the unit with professionals
trained in education or treatment, Clarke seems to consider experience as
military drillmasters the most important qualification for deputies assigned to
prepare offenders for success in the outside world.
After all, most jobs in the real world require
marching in step and counting cadence.
Although Clarke has been extremely vague about the
details of his boot camp, he’s indicated it will include 5 a.m. wakeup calls,
early morning runs, fitness training and work details.
Clarke also mentioned education and job training,
but it’s not clear who would provide such classes since those are the programs
he would prefer to see phased out and replaced with boot camps.
Clarke’s emphasis on physical fitness is admirable,
but he seems to forget who it was who eliminated fitness programs for the
incarcerated in the first place.
It was conservative politicians like himself, egged
on by right-wing radio, who swept through corrections facilities and removed
gyms and weight-training equipment.
They said they didn’t want offenders to develop
bigger muscles than the guards. Seriously. That was the public justification.
There are very good reasons why most boot camp
programs around the country have been discredited. By emphasizing yelling at
people and harsh physical treatment, they are an open invitation for abusive
personalities in authority to cross the line.
But, most important, they show very little success.
Most studies show little difference in recidivism between those who go through
boot camp programs and those who go through no programming at all.
What does work is drug and alcohol treatment, G.E.D.
education and job training, the positive programs Clarke disdains.
Before the recession brought most hiring to a
screeching halt, Wisconsin Community Services had an amazing record at the
county of connecting hard-to-employ incarcerated offenders to real jobs.
Boot camps provide far less positive support and
tools for people who want to successfully change their lives, but Clarke knows
it will be several years before poor results demonstrate that.
In the meantime, it will be such fun to shout in
people’s faces that they are disgusting insects.
Comment on this article at expressmilwaukee.com.



If only you hadn't written paragrph #3 Full Metal Jacket
You make an association that the military boot camp model itself is flawed as well implying that those of us who have served are some kind of dopes.
First, is there no greater public service than the willingness to put your life on the line for the country you live in? Second, It's the job of the Drill Instuctors to bring you to a place of self-discipline, sacrifice, loyalty and obedience. They do this by applying various degrees of physical and mental stress while also teaching you the rules, policies and etiquette of the military. These methods are scientifically and psychologically designed to tear apart the "civilian" and build a proud, fit, dedicated, person of duty- not cannon fodder.
The rest of your article seemed on point, It's just that I was still peeved.
Joel, I hate to tell you this but jobs in the "real world" do involve respecting authority, discipline, and order. After being fired from nearly every job you've had this is something that's probably lost on you and you'd prefer to simply blame someone else for your lack of talent.
How does a "journalist" get away with writing a scathing article like this and not quote a single study, statistic, or fact? Simply saying "Studies show..." doesn't cut the cheese.
Jail is supposed to be a deterrent, not a place where you catch up on episodes of Maury.
You can always count a liberal relic like joey mcnally to defend criminal dirtbags.
My undersstanding is that it would have to be a court ordered program. How do the judges feel about sentencing offenders to this program?